Why do enterprise systems still refuse to talk to each other?

Photo courtesy of
rawpixel.com.

Opinions expressed by Digital Journal contributors are their own.

Every company today uses about 1,061 different software applications. Most of these programs cannot communicate with each other. Finance teams pull data from one system, fix it in Excel, then put it into another system. HR workers type the same employee details into five different programs. IT gets calls about data that should have moved automatically but didn’t.

This mess costs real money. Large enterprises account for the majority (~70%) of data-integration spending. because they often fail to integrate effectively together. Companies spend millions on software, but can’t get their tools to communicate.

The real problem isn’t just technical. When systems can’t share information, people become the connection between them. Workers spend hours copying, pasting, and fixing data errors. This slows down decisions and creates mistakes that spread through the whole business.

That’s where Padmanabham Venkiteela comes in. He has spent seven years fixing this exact problem at major cybersecurity companies like McAfee and Trellix. He saw teams building the same system connections over and over. Teams would connect SAP to Salesforce, then six months later, another team would build the same connection from scratch. Each project took months and needed constant fixes when things broke.

His approach focused on a clear principle. Treat connecting systems like building software. Make it once, use it everywhere. Create templates that handle common problems like error tracking and data fixes so teams don’t start over every time.

Making connections that work

The hard part wasn’t just moving data from one place to another. Modern companies need information to sync instantly across dozens of programs, with smart error handling that doesn’t crash everything when something goes wrong. He built reusable templates for the most common business connections. SAP for money data, Salesforce for customers, Workday for employees, and Oracle for daily operations.

Instead of writing custom code each time, his templates could be set up and running in weeks instead of months. Internal metrics indicated measurable improvements. Projects finished 30-40% faster. Support calls about broken data drops fell 25%. Manual work in HR and finance dropped 60% as automated systems took over tasks like payroll checks and bill processing.

These templates did more than just move data around. He set up complete business processes across multiple departments. New employee setup used to require manual work between HR, IT, and facilities teams. Now it happens automatically. A new hire gets entered in Workday, which triggers account setup in Salesforce, creates access in SAP, and updates security systems with minimal manual intervention.

“The key was changing from connecting two systems to building a framework that works everywhere,” Padmanabham Venkiteela says. “Once you have solid patterns for handling errors and changing data formats, you can use them with any combination of systems.”

Building reliable automation workflows.

Money operations got the same treatment. Processing invoices used to take weeks as approvals moved between departments. Now it takes days through automated routing and checking. Real-time payroll verification eliminated quarterly scrambles to fix differences between systems.

These weren’t one-off wins. Other teams adopted his templates across more than 10 major company projects. Teams documented everything in internal guides and reused the work across business units. When corporate splits separated McAfee Consumer and Trellix from FireEye, the templates kept working across all three companies.

The technical setup also enabled advanced data analysis. By building pipes from SAP to BigQuery, he created the foundation for executive dashboards and machine learning tools. Revenue prediction models and risk analysis that used to need weeks of data prep could now run on live information feeds.

“Most integration projects just focus on moving data from here to there,” he explains. “But the real value happens when you can use that data right away to make decisions.”

How does this change the business?

The numbers show why this matters. Gartner says 30% of companies will automate more than half of their network activities by 2026, up from less than 10% in 2023. This isn’t just about new technology. It’s about how businesses run.

The automation market proves this point. Process automation will grow from $13 billion in 2024 to $23.9 billion by 2029. Companies are realizing they can’t compete when their systems don’t work together.

His work shows what this change looks like in real life. His integration templates didn’t just fix technical problems. They changed how whole organizations work. Finance teams close their books faster. HR departments get new employees started more efficiently. Sales teams get real-time data that used to take days to gather.

The effects spread beyond individual departments. When systems communicate smoothly, organizations respond faster to market changes, make decisions based on current information, and eliminate manual work that slows everything down.

Companies with good system integration have cleaner data, faster processes, and teams focused on creating value instead of managing spreadsheets. The benefits compound over time as more processes get automated and more data becomes available instantly.

What comes next

But challenges remain on both technical and business sides. Building reliable system connections requires understanding how different platforms work and what business processes they support. It needs frameworks that handle problems smoothly, work across departments, and adapt as systems change.

The best integration work treats connection as a long-term business capability, not just a one-time project. Teams build reusable tools, document what they learn, and create foundations for future improvements.

As companies keep adding new software to their technology mix, the ability to integrate quickly becomes a competitive edge. Organizations that master this capability move faster, make better decisions, and adapt more easily to changing conditions.

The discussion around business system integration is shifting from whether to automate to how fast automation can happen. For technical workers in this field, the opportunity isn’t just connecting systems. It’s changing how modern businesses operate.

Companies that solve integration problems at scale will end up with better data, faster processes, and workers focused on important tasks instead of data entry. The technology exists. Established methods are available. The question is which organizations will put them to use first.